Authenticity assessment
Email authenticity and alteration
Examine whether a disputed message is consistent with its claimed origin and history, and identify what the available evidence cannot resolve.
Read more →Our services
Examination shaped by the question
Define what needs to be established before choosing the collection or analysis method. Scope, authority and feasibility are agreed for every instruction.
Original content baseline 6 November 2026 · Content revision 0.3
No results found. Try a broader term or clear the filters.
Preserve the available record
Preservation and forensic collection
Identify suitable evidence sources and collect an agreed scope with a record of the method, limitations and changes introduced.
Read more →Recovery feasibility
Deleted or missing email
Assess whether relevant correspondence survives and distinguish recovered deleted material from copies found elsewhere.
Read more →Reconstruct the communication
Business email compromise and payment diversion
Examine disputed payment instructions and available account records to assess how an email chain may have been manipulated.
Read more →Proportionate examination
Employee and internal investigations
Examine authorised email evidence relevant to a defined concern about disclosure, deletion, diversion or account use.
Read more →Reconcile the record
Mailbox comparison and chronology
Compare supplied message sets, explain differences and reconstruct relevant sequences without assuming either collection is complete.
Read more →Examine the document in context
Attachments and linked material
Assess attachment versions and their relationship to messages, while treating cloud links as a separate historical evidence question.
Read more →From source to review
Litigation and eDiscovery support
Prepare email evidence for an agreed review or disclosure workflow while retaining its provenance and relevant relationships.
Read more →Explain the findings
Independent reports and expert evidence
Agree a report that answers the instructed technical questions, identifies its evidence base and makes limitations clear.
Read more →